All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Join our
Treating classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Spotlight on targeted therapies
with Gilles Salles, Paul Bröckelmann, and Ann S. LaCasce
Saturday, November 2, 2024
8:50-9:50 CET
This independent educational activity is sponsored by Takeda. All content is developed independently by the faculty. Funders are allowed no direct influence on the content of this activity.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
The first-in-class peptide–drug conjugate, melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), is being widely investigated in the multiple myeloma (MM) setting in the hope to address the unmet clinical need of patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM (RRMM).1
The Multiple Myeloma Hub has previously reported data from a variety of trials evaluating melflufen for the treatment of MM. In particular, the phase II HORIZON study uncovered the encouraging clinical efficacy of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone (dex) for the treatment of patients with RRMM, and the combination is currently under priority review with a decision due in February 2021.2
Paul Richardson and colleagues recently published the latest data from the HORIZON study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, in which melflufen plus dex exhibited an overall response rate (ORR) of 29%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 11.6 months.1 For more information on the status of melflufen in combination with novel agents for the treatment of RRMM, listen to our podcast with Paul Richardson below. The promising safety and efficacy profiles of melflufen in combination with dex have provided the rationale for the further investigation of melflufen as part of a triplet regimen.
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) + novel agents for RRMM
At the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, Enrique Ocio presented the latest data from the phase I/IIa ANCHOR (OP-104; NCT03481556) study evaluating melflufen plus dex and either daratumumab (dara) or bortezomib (BTZ) for the treatment of patients with RRMM.3
Patients were eligible for the study if they met the following criteria:
The phase I dose escalation study followed a 3 × 3 design whereby patients received treatment as outlined in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schema of phase I ANCHOR study for patients assigned to A, the BTZ arm, and B, the dara arm3
BTZ, bortezomib; dara, daratumumab; dex, dexamethasone; IV, intravenous; po, orally; SC, subcutaneous.In phase I, the recommended melflufen dose was based on any dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed. When the optimal dose was found, a further 20 patients were recruited to each treatment arm, constituting the phase II of the study. The primary objectives from phases I and II were optimal melflufen dose in combination and ORR, respectively. The data cutoff was October 19, 2020.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients in the BTZ arm of the ANCHOR trial3
BTZ, bortezomib; dex, dexamethasone; PI, proteasome inhibitor. |
|
Characteristic |
Melflufen + dex + BTZ (N = 13) |
Median age, years |
72 |
Median prior lines of therapy, n |
3 |
High-risk cytogenetics, % |
44 |
Refractory to last therapy, % |
77 |
Prior PI treatment, % |
92 |
Table 2. Patient responses in the BTZ arm of the ANCHOR trial3
BTZ, bortezomib; CBR, clinical benefit rate; CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response. |
|||
Patient response |
Melflufen dose |
||
Best confirmed response, n |
30 mg (n = 6) |
40 mg (n = 7) |
Total (N = 13) |
> CR |
0 |
1 |
1 |
VGPR |
1 |
3 |
4 |
PR |
2 |
1 |
3 |
ORR, % |
50 |
71 |
62 |
CBR, % |
50 |
71 |
62 |
Table 3. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs observed in patients in the BTZ arm of the ANCHOR trial3
BTZ, bortezomib; TRAEs, treatment-related adverse events. |
|||
Grade ≥ 3 TRAE, % |
Melflufen dose |
||
30 mg (n = 6) |
40 mg (n = 7) |
Total (N = 13) |
|
Any Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs |
83 |
100 |
92 |
Thrombocytopenia |
50 |
100 |
77 |
Neutropenia |
33 |
71 |
54 |
Anemia |
33 |
57 |
46 |
Table 4. Characteristics of patients in the dara arm of the ANCHOR trial3
ASCT, allogeneic stem cell transplant; dara, daratumumab; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug; ISS, International Scoring System; PI, proteasome inhibitor. *Determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and defined as t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(17/17p), or gain(1q). |
|||
Characteristic |
Melflufen dose |
||
30 mg (n = 6) |
40 mg (n = 27) |
Total (N = 33) |
|
Median age, years |
57 |
66 |
63 |
Male sex, % |
50 |
70 |
67 |
Median prior lines of therapy, n |
2.5 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
High-risk cytogenetics, %* |
40 |
57 |
54 |
ECOG score 2, % |
17 |
7 |
9 |
ISS III, % |
0 |
11 |
9 |
Refractory to last therapy, % |
50 |
63 |
61 |
IMiD refractory, % |
50 |
67 |
64 |
PI refractory, % |
0 |
56 |
45 |
IMiD and PI refractory, % |
0 |
44 |
36 |
Alkylator refractory, % |
17 |
11 |
12 |
Prior ASCT / alkylator treatment, % |
83/83 |
78/89 |
79/88 |
Table 5. Patient responses in the dara arm of the ANCHOR trial3
CBR, clinical benefit rate; CR, complete response; dara, daratumumab; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response. |
|||
Patient response |
Melflufen dose |
||
Best confirmed response, n |
30 mg (n = 6) |
40 mg (n = 27) |
Total (N = 33) |
> CR |
0 |
2 |
2 |
VGPR |
4 |
6 |
10 |
PR |
1 |
11 |
12 |
ORR, % |
83 |
70 |
73 |
CBR, % |
83 |
74 |
76 |
Table 6. Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs observed in patients in the dara arm of the ANCHOR trial3
Dara, daratumumab; TRAEs, treatment-related adverse events. |
|||
Grade ≥ 3 TRAE, % |
Melflufen dose |
||
30 mg (n = 6) |
40 mg (n = 27) |
Total (N = 33) |
|
Overall |
83 |
89 |
88 |
Thrombocytopenia |
50 |
78 |
73 |
Neutropenia |
83 |
63 |
67 |
Anemia |
50 |
19 |
24 |
Lymphopenia |
0 |
7 |
6 |
Febrile neutropenia |
17 |
4 |
6 |
Pneumonia |
0 |
7 |
6 |
Melflufen in combination with dex and BTZ/dara demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with RRMM, with ORRs of 73% and 62% in the dara and BTZ cohorts, respectively. Safety profiles of the melflufen-containing triplets were similar to that of melflufen + dexa alone, and the triplet regimens were well tolerated in patients with RRMM. Hematological TRAEs were controlled with dose reductions and no DLTs were observed across the entire study.
A dose of 30 mg melflufen has been recommended in patients receiving it in combination with dex and dara, and in light of these data, a phase III trial evaluating melflufen + dex + dara vs dara single-agent has started recently recruiting patients with RRMM (LIGHTHOUSE study, NCT04649060).
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox