All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Join our
Treating classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Spotlight on targeted therapies
with Gilles Salles, Paul Bröckelmann, and Ann S. LaCasce
Saturday, November 2, 2024
8:50-9:50 CET
This independent educational activity is sponsored by Takeda. All content is developed independently by the faculty. Funders are allowed no direct influence on the content of this activity.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
The United States (US) Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of daratumumab (D), lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone (d; D-Rd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).1-3
The approval is based on the results of the phase III MAIA study (MMY 3008) which compared D-Rd to Rd alone. The interim results of the study were presented by Thierry Facon during the late breaking abstracts session at the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting in San Diego, CA, in December 2018.4
Whilst this brings a new option to patients with non-transplant eligible NDMM in the US, this regimen is not yet approved in Europe, though a type II variation application was previously submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA).5
The phase III MAIA trial compared D-Rd (n = 368) to Rd alone (n = 369) in patients with NDMM who were not candidates for ASCT. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS).
At a median follow-up of 28 months, the PFS rate for the D-Rd arm was not reached (NR), compared to 31.9 months for the Rd arm. The D-Rd regimen gave a 44% reduction in the risk of progression or death with a higher rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10-5) which was 24% with D-Rd arm versus 7% with Rd (P < 0.0001). Table 1 shows a further breakdown of results.
Overall, the D-Rd triplet led to deeper responses, a three-fold higher MRD negativity rate, and had a comparable safety profile to that reported in other studies such as POLLUX and ALYCONE.
Table 1: Summary of MAIA clinical trial4,5
Trial name |
MAIA (MMY3008) |
---|---|
NCT reference |
|
Drug combination |
DRd Rd |
Patient setting |
Transplant ineligible NDMM |
Trial phase |
Phase III |
Trial design |
DRd versus Rd |
N |
737 |
Dosing schedule |
Rd: oral lenalidomide (25 mg) on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle with 40 mg dexamethasone once per week. DRd: As per Rd arm with the addition of intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg) once weekly for cycles 1–2, every 2 weeks for cycles 3–6 and every 4 weeks for cycle 7 onwards until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study end |
Primary endpoint |
PFS |
Efficacy (Given as DRd vs Rd) |
Median follow-up: 28 months Median PFS: not reached vs 31.9 months ≥CR: 47.6% vs 24.7% ORR: 93% vs 81% Risk of reduction of disease progression or death with DRd vs Rd alone: 44% (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.43–0.73, P < 0.0001) |
Safety
|
In the DRd arm, there were higher rates (≥5% difference) of grade 3/4 pneumonia, neutropenia and leukopenia Safety profile is in line with previously reported daratumumab studies |
CR, complete response; Drd, Daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamehasome; NDMM, newly diagnose multiple myeloma; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression free survival |
Read the full results reported during the ASH 2018 meeting here.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox