All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Join our
Treating classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Spotlight on targeted therapies
with Gilles Salles, Paul Bröckelmann, and Ann S. LaCasce
Saturday, November 2, 2024
8:50-9:50 CET
This independent educational activity is sponsored by Takeda. All content is developed independently by the faculty. Funders are allowed no direct influence on the content of this activity.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
The addition of anti-CD38 antibodies within induction therapies has produced markedly improved outcomes in response rates and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, data are lacking for the high-risk subset of patients who have been historically unrepresented in large trials for multiple myeloma. Thus, there is an unmet need for a more defined frontline treatment that overcomes the poor prognosis of this subgroup of patients.
At the 26th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA2021), Katja Weisel, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, DE, presented an updated interim analysis of the ongoing GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842).1 This phase II trial investigated a quadruple combination of the anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab, plus carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd), for patients with high-risk NDMM. Isatuximab was used as the anti-CD38 therapy, owing to previous evidence of its antitumor activity, multiple modes of action, and unique clinical profile. Carfilzomib was chosen over bortezomib as the proteasome inhibitor, because of its high efficacy in the frontline setting and superiority when used at relapse.1
The GMMG-CONCEPT trial is a phase II, multicenter study investigating Isa-KRd in the following treatment arms:
The trial recruited 153 patients, and will reopen to enroll further patients (n = 93) in Arm A. In this interim analysis, the first 50 patients receiving the study induction therapy were included. The dosing schedule for induction cycles is summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Isa-KRd dosing schedule for Cycle 1 (28 days) and Cycles 2−6 (28 days) of induction therapy*
Dex, dexamethasone; Isa, Isatuximab; K, carfilzomib; Len, lenalidomide; Isa-KRd, isatuximab plus carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone.
*Adapted from Leypoldt et al.1
†Dose adaptation of lenalidomide according to renal function.
‡20 mg in patients ≥75 years.
Patient characteristics for the interim analysis cohort (n = 50) are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Patient characteristics*
Characteristic |
N = 50 |
---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
58 (42−82) |
Arm A |
58 (42−69) |
Arm B |
77 (72−82) |
Female, % |
58 |
ECOG performance status, % |
|
0 |
42 |
1 |
46 |
2 |
12 |
ISS disease stage, % |
|
II |
56 |
III |
44 |
High-risk cytogenetics, % |
|
Del17p |
52 |
t(4;14) |
38 |
t(14;16) |
12 |
>3 copies 1q21 |
42 |
Any two high-risk aberrations |
26 |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ISS, International Staging System. |
Table 2. Summary of Grade 3−4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)*
N = 50 |
Grade 3−4 TEAE |
---|---|
Hematologic, % |
|
Leukopenia |
26 |
Neutropenia |
34 |
Lymphopenia |
28 |
Anemia |
10 |
Thrombocytopenia |
14 |
Febrile neutropenia |
4 |
Nonhematologic, % |
|
Peripheral sensory neuropathy |
2 |
Hypertension |
12 |
Cardiac failure |
4 |
TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. |
Overall, the updated interim analysis of the GMMG-CONCEPT trial demonstrated deep and durable responses with an Isa-KRd quadruple regimen for patients with high-risk NDMM. Encouragingly, there was a high PFS rate at 12 and 24 months (79.6% and 75.5%, respectively), and a significant number of patients achieved MRD negativity during induction, which is associated with improved long-term prognosis. Although response appeared to be irrespective of transplant eligibility, a greater number of transplant-ineligible patients is required for a more substantial consensus. A favorable safety profile was maintained; however, the investigators highlighted the need to monitor infections continuously alongside the treatment.
For further information on this interim analysis, watch below the Multiple Myeloma Hub interview with Katja Weisel.
Can Isa-KRd achieve deep responses in high-risk NDMM, regardless of transplant eligibility?
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox