All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Join our
Treating classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Spotlight on targeted therapies
with Gilles Salles, Paul Bröckelmann, and Ann S. LaCasce
Saturday, November 2, 2024
8:50-9:50 CET
This independent educational activity is sponsored by Takeda. All content is developed independently by the faculty. Funders are allowed no direct influence on the content of this activity.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Positive topline results from the second part of the phase III CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) study were announced on October 21, 2020.
The first part of the CASSIOPEIA study aimed to compare daratumumab (Dara), an anti-CD38 antibody, plus bortezomib (V), thalidomide (T), and dexamethasone (d) versus VTd alone in 1,085 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The quadruplet was well tolerated and provided significant clinical benefit compared with VTd in this population of patients (read the full results here).
The second part of the study evaluated Dara as maintenance treatment (16 mg/kg every 8 weeks, for up to 2 years) versus no treatment (observation) in patients who achieved a response; the primary endpoint of this second part was progression-free survival (PFS).
This second part met its primary endpoint of improving PFS at a pre-planned interim analysis (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42–0.68; p < 0.0001), with a reduction in the risk of progression or death in patients who received Dara of 47%. The safety profile was consistent with the known Dara safety profile.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox