All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Join our

Treating classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Spotlight on targeted therapies

with Gilles Salles, Paul Bröckelmann, and Ann S. LaCasce

Saturday, November 2, 2024
8:50-9:50 CET

Register now

This independent educational activity is sponsored by Takeda. All content is developed independently by the faculty. Funders are allowed no direct influence on the content of this activity.

  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.

2024-03-05T12:58:20.000Z

GMMG-CONCEPT trial: Isa-KRd for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed MM

Mar 5, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma.

Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma have poor survival outcomes and few prospective trials aiming to determine the optimal treatment strategy. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity is the strongest predictor of survival; therefore, is crucial for this patient population.

Leypoldt et al.1 recently published results from the phase II GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842) in Journal of Clinical Oncology investigating transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-non-eligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd), followed by triplet maintenance. We summarize the key points below.

Study design1

  • Non-randomized multicenter phase II study
  • Study arm A included TE patients who received six cycles of Isa-KRd induction, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant
  • Study arm B included TNE patients, and received identical induction, consolidation, maintenance, and two extra cycles of Isa-KRd
  • The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching MRD negativity (<10−5)

Key findings1

  • N = 153
    • TE patients = 127
    • TNE patients = 26
  • Overall, 73% of TE patients completed consolidation and started maintenance therapy vs 58% of TNE patients.
  • The overall response rate was comparable between TE and TNE patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Response rates of TE and TNE patients treated with Isa-KRd* 

CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; TE, transplant-eligible; TNE, transplant-non-eligible; VGPR, very good PR.
*Adapted from Leypoldt, et al.1

  • Post-consolidation, 67.7% of TE patients experienced MRD negativity (p = 0.004) vs 54.2% of TNE patients (p =0.012).
  • Sustained MRD negativity rates at ≥6 months and ≥12 months were higher for TE patients vs TNE patients (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Rates of sustained MRD negativity at ≥6 months and ≥12 months in TE and TNE patients treated with Isa-KRd* 

MRD, measurable residual disease; TE, transplant-eligible; TNE, transplant-non-eligible.
*Adapted from Leypoldt, et al.1

  • Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached in either study arm.

Safety1

  • Treatment was tolerable, with a manageable safety profile
    • The safety profile was comparable between TE and TNE patients and was consistent with previous reports
  • In total, 92.6% of patients experienced ≥1 adverse event

Key learnings

  • An extensive quadruplet approach resulted in high rates of sustained MRD negativity and progression free survival duration in a difficult-to-treat patient population.
  • T-cell engaging strategies in frontline treatment to replace melphalan or use of bispecific antibodies during maintenance could further optimize treatment and result in unprecedented rates of MRD negativity

  1. Leypoldt L, Tichy D, Besemer B, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;42(1):26-37. DOI: 1200/JCO.23.01696

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the Multiple Myeloma Hub?
47 votes - 9 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox